Microlife: Etymology and Pronunciation

  1. Etymology of names
  2. Pronunciation of names
  3. References – see main list


Several sources list etymologies for algal names, for instance “Introduction to the Algae, 2nd ed.” (1985) by Bold and Wynne. For protozoans and other groups they are harder to find, and in fact many were never given an explicit etymology, but many are fairly clear from common Greek and Latin elements.

The words I have given are thus meant to represent the root rather than an exact form, and when the same one appears in both Greek and Latin I’ve mostly preferred the former. To make it clear how they relate and avoid using an alphabet that might be unfamiliar, the following transliteration is used:

α = aε = eι = iν = nρ = rφ = phʽ = h
β = bζ = zκ = kξ = xσ = sχ = ch
γ = gη = ēλ = lο = oτ = tψ = ps
δ = dθ = thμ = mπ = pυ = y,uω = ō

When genera are named after a person they are usually at least mentioned in the original source. There are also a few where the roots are less obvious or otherwise deserve further comment:

1. Nostoc were named by the 16th century physician Paracelsus, who said they seemed as if blown from nostrils of planets. Potts (1997) thus explained the name as a mix of Old English nosþyrl and German nasenloch, both meaning nostril. The overlap seems odd, though, and I wonder if a root like tóch, sticky, might not be as likely.

2. Coleps looks like it should be from Greek kōlēps, the bend of the knee. However neither the meaning nor gender fits with the genus, as pointed out in a review by Foissner et al. (2008). Nitzsch introduced the name without any explanation, but they propose Latin colum, strainer or sieve, as a possible source.

I could also imagine that kōlēps might be used in place of related kōlea or kōlē, thigh or ham, which refer to both the body part and cut of meat. At least today hams are often tied or scored in a regular pattern, which if common then could have been a fair analogy for colepid armour.

3. Euplotes has been called a derivative of Greek plōs, swimmer, but it looks closer to plōtos, floating. Ehrenberg originally named them Euploea or “Nachenthierchen” with the single species E. charon, all a reference to the mythical barque or ferry of Charon, so I have taken the latter as a preferrable interpretation.

4. Chydorus was introduced without comment by Leach. I have found two suggested roots: Greek doros, wallet, in “Composition of Scientific Words” by Brown (1956) and hydōr, water, in the “Encyclopædic Dictionary” (1881) ed. Hunter. However these leave the odd prefix chy- unexplained.

Leach and others named many crustaceans after figures in classical myth or history, not always with obvious reasons. Here the closest sounding is Cheidōros, Herodotus’s name for the river Gallikos drunk dry by the Persian army. This was even written Chydorus in a few older dictionaries so seems like a plausible source.

5. Moina was not explained by Baird but he did say he named Bosmina for a daughter of Fingal, who is from the works of Ossian by James Macpherson, then supposed to be a Gaelic epic. These poems also have a Moina, the ill-fated wife of Fingal’s uncle, so I think it is reasonable to assume this genus was likewise named for her.


Scientific names are all formally treated as Latin, but while much of this language has been conserved, it has found different pronunciations in classical, medieval, and other contexts. There is some tradition of use in English heard in law and science, but this too varies, subject to both different dialects and change over time.

There is then no single correct way to say a name, and often it really is best to go with whatever sounds natural. But I think to people who are not used to it that can be more daunting than helpful. So I have provided anglicizations, hopefully understood as only one option, but meant to be one that can be trusted as generally understandable.

For the most part these follow a reasonably conservative tradition, with shifted vowel sounds common in English but following the traditional Latin accent. This depends on knowing the etymology of the last part of the name. The second last syllable, called the penult, is stressed if:

  1. It is long by position, with a short vowel followed by multiple consonants (with exceptions for r, l)
  2. It is long by nature, with a long vowel or diphthong (vowel pair) in the root word
  3. It is the first syllable
If not stress is on the syllable prior. Many names are also sometimes spoken with stress on the penult regardless, particularly when its vowel is y, and this seems universal for a few like Saccharomyces. But though this would be an easier rule, for many other names like Rhinoceros or Pteranodon I have never heard that done.

The combinations ae and oe are mostly treated as long e, but it has also become common to say them as diphthongs, and at least in plurals like larvae I think this may be regional. The other diphthongs are more consistent, while most single vowels before the penult are short or reduced, except sometimes at the beginnings of words.

For these initial syllables there is not much consistency to build on. For instance long e is often used in thecamoebae yet never in Penicillium. Here I have kept most a, e short except in special cases. If the results sound overly strange, please let me know, but again keep in mind these are only possible suggestions.